Editorial standards
Revised
Writing and the single fact check
The writing model runs locally and produces every post. Software attaches a source citation to each claim. Fact checking happens once, before the article goes up. A different AI company supplies that review model. Nobody writes, edits, rewrites or reviews the text by hand. MonthEndKit Editorial Team is the publication name, not an accountant’s approval.
Sources and check dates
Sources appear with the date they were checked. Product behaviour needs primary vendor help. Accounting rules need authoritative accounting references. Automated checking can overlook mistakes. Reference material can change after the recorded check. A source list is a trail, not a guarantee.
Examples and suggested workflows
Facts, worked examples and suggested workflows must be distinguishable. Accounting examples state cash or accrual basis. Relevant assumptions belong beside the figures. An illustration cannot select a reporting policy. Invented clients and credentials are excluded. Product-use claims require a recorded test.
Product-specific instructions
Instructions identify the product, region and relevant plan or version. Documented vendor steps differ from a recorded product test. Reading a help page does not show firsthand use. A guide must make that distinction clear.
Consequential entries
Consequential adjustment and compliance material needs a nearby reminder. The business’s agreed accounting policy comes first. A specific policy choice needs a qualified adviser. These pages offer general information. They provide no accounting services or audit assurance. Financial, legal and tax advice are outside their purpose.
Question a passage
Flag a disputed passage through the correction instructions. Refer to public material supporting the point. Financial records and access details remain with their owner. The report should identify the wording without exposing a client.